Analyzing Student-Centered Learning Approaches in Secondary Education Using Qualitative Library Research Methods

Penulis

  • Daffa Fathir Ilyasyah Universitas Negri Yogyakarta

Kata Kunci:

Student-Centered Learning, Secondary Education, Qualitative Research, Library Research, Thematic Analysis

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze Student-Centered Learning (SCL) approaches in secondary education through a qualitative library research method. Student-Centered Learning has emerged as a prominent educational paradigm that emphasizes active student participation, learner autonomy, collaboration, and critical thinking in the learning process. The study employed a qualitative approach by collecting and analyzing secondary data from scholarly journal articles, academic books, research reports, and relevant educational literature published in reputable sources. Data were gathered using library research techniques and analyzed through thematic analysis to identify recurring themes related to the principles, implementation strategies, benefits, and challenges of Student-Centered Learning in secondary education. The findings reveal that SCL is grounded in constructivist and humanistic learning theories and is commonly implemented through inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, collaborative learning, and technology-enhanced learning. Furthermore, the literature indicates that SCL contributes positively to students’ academic engagement, motivation, critical thinking skills, social competencies, and independent learning abilities. However, challenges such as teacher preparedness, resource limitations, classroom management, and assessment constraints remain significant barriers to effective implementation. The study concludes that Student-Centered Learning is a valuable pedagogical approach for fostering twenty-first-century competencies and improving educational quality in secondary schools.

Referensi

Amiruddin, Baharuddin, Takbir, & Setialaksana, W. (2023). May Student-Centered Principles Affect Active Learning and Its Counterpart? An Empirical Study of Indonesian Curriculum Implementation. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231214375

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cheng, H.-Y., & Chen, L. (2022). Investigating How Student-Centered and Teacher-Centered Teaching Paradigms Relate to the Academic Motivation and Learning Behaviors of Secondary School Students in China. Educational Psychology, 45(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2022.2096299

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gusmira, Y. (2025). The Implementation of Student-Centered Learning. International Journal of Educational Sciences and Development, 3(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.54099/ijesd.v3i2.1603

Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A Student-Centered Approach Using Modern Technologies in Distance Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(61), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8

Li, Y.-D., & Ding, G.-H. (2023). Student-Centered Education: A Meta-Analysis of Its Effects on Non-Academic Achievements. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231168792

Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.

Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to Learn for the 80s. Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan (3rd ed.). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Diterbitkan

2026-06-30